In the beginning of Sophocles’ play, Oedipus is portrayed as the ideal leader. He is exceptionally understanding and compassionate, telling the priest “my spirit groans for the city, for myself, for you” (66). While he deeply cares about the citizens’ well-beings, he remains a down-to-earth king, making sure that he himself—not a messenger—talks to the people about any concerns they have. Oedipus not only directly addresses the problem of the plague but also already has anticipated this issue. His impeccable foresight (possibly not in his own life, but in city affairs) ensured his speedy thinking: he has already sent Creon to bring the oracle back, in the hopes that the message will offer advice to stop the plague. Finally, Oedipus is courageous, committed, and possesses a strong sense of conviction. He adamantly promises the city a horrible punishment for the perpetrator and reaffirms his dedication to his people, pledging “I will do all that I can” (147). He will catch the murdered even if the killer is someone close to him. Initially, his positive qualities are repeatedly highlighted. Yet, as readers continue the play, they realize “Oedipus the King” is very much like many other Greek plays. Oedipus’s premature greatness is an indication of his imminent downfall.Oedipus’s speedy thinking turns out to be his best quality and his worst quality. The King is quick to evaluate a situation, judge the conflict, and pollute the interaction with his demanding demeanor. Oedipus swiftly praises Teiresias as the only one who can guard or save the city from destruction. But a matter of fifty lines later, as soon as Tieresias cooperates less than liked, Oedipus accuses him of murdering Laios, calls him “pollution of this country,” and then vehemently brands Tieresias a traitor. His hot temper is evident when he charges his uncle/brother-in-law, Creon, with plotting to kill him and take over the throne. While Creon is calm, well-spoken, and composed, Oedipus continues to ask rhetorical questions as a way to “corner his victim.” At times, Oedipus is clearly delusional. When he feels attacked, he lashes back with haughty comments even when no threat is imminent. He automatically assumes any change in status-quo is a threat. As a great leader, Oedipus should be extremely comfortable adapting to any changes because being comfortable with change is having faith in himself that the citizens (and audience) will believe in their King no matter what. Moreover, Oedipus relies heavily on his temporary “highs,” his recurring belief that he is invincible and untouchable. Yet these highs are false; they are merely created when Oedipus “elevates” himself above other people, by jabbing them with cheap attempts at wit and inciting fear.
While most readers have lost faith in Oedipus by now, we pity him when we realize he only knows half the truth: he murdered Laios. He still has not discovered that his prophecy is yet to come true. Oedipus’s final realization of the truth, his affirmation of reality, his comeback, is why readers enjoy his character. While Oedipus comes full circle, readers also feel emotionally satisfied: although blind, Oedipus has seen the light. (517)
Music: Regina Spektor, “Oedipus”
www.reginaspektor.com --> click music --> click "songs" --> skip Samson to next song
14 comments:
Danni!
First off, I would like to say that your blog is super pretty! Secondly, I really liked this post. What you point out is very important for the reader to notice--Oedipus, though a good king, turns out to be his own downfall. Furthermore, I like that you emphasize the point that his impulsive attitude (towards life) causes him to change his opinions at the spur of the moment.
Good job :)
Manasi
Hey Danni,
I really liked the set up of your entry. You started by telling us all the reasons Oedipus seems like he'll be a good king, but ultimately fails to live up to the ideal. I especially liked your closing line :)
Nice work!
-Pipes
Danni - I'd like to reiterate what Manasi and Piper commented. I am impressed by the detailed points behind your logical reasoning in portraying how Oedipus is his own downfall. Your final paragraph sums up how I felt as I finished the story. Nice Regina Spektor song (I wish it was Taylor Swift hahaha).
Wong
I love that you explained the typical tragic flaw in terms of how the reader sees the character rather than in greek terms. it really sheds light on how we, as readers, react to flaws that are apparent to us and not the the person involved. love it!
Hey Danni,
I like how you talked about how Oedipus did have some excellent qualities as a leader even though these qualities turned out to work against him in the end. I also liked how you talked about the reader being satisfied with the play because Oedipus finally sees the light. It is not the best thing for him to go through, but he finally does come to terms with himself and what he has done.
Nice job!
Kaleena
Danni, I liked how you pointed out that quick thinking was both Oedipus's best and worst quality. I totally agree. Michele
Iris Lin--
I really like the additions of pictures and apparently some form of music in your blog. It shows a level of commitment beyond the ordinary. As you correctly note, by making Oedipus seem like such a great king, Sophocles makes it all the more tragic when he shows us his demise. Though as you noted, there are some subtle flaws such as his hubris and temper. It is great to see Oedipus's redeeming qualities come up at the end of the play as you also stated. I feel that all ill will towards him gets lost once he gouges out his eyes and accepts his exile without question.
Navdeep Khera
Danni -
Firstly, I want to say that this blog is beautifully written. You arranged your post like an essay, cohesive, formal, and organized. I think starting with Oedipus strong points (few and far between) and explaining his flaws was a great idea. I certainly agree with his quick thinking not only being a strength and a weakness.
-Karen
PS: I liked the song!
DLin....may I just say fantastic blog. You really hit some key points that allowed me to understand the story so much better. It's true how even though Oedipus changes his opinions of people faster than Paris Hilton changes boyfriends we still feel sympathy for him at the end of the play.
Nat
-Danni-
I am impressed by your blog entry. You really cleared some things up. I agree with the very detailed points supporting your thesis. I learned a lot from your entry it is very essay like. Thank you.
Danni--
I like your post. I definitely agree about how the reader reacts to character of Oedipus. I reacted that ways towards him. It is the very qualities that make him a leader that brings him to his downfall. And I ended up pitying him at the end of the story. I think your blog does well to capture the general reaction of the reader as well as the tragic flaw of Oedipus. Great job!
You did a wonderful job showing Oedipus as a respectable leader at the beginning of the play while convincing the reader later that Oedipus is actually too quick minded and harsh to lead effectively. I also really enjoyed the plethora of bomb vocabulary that you use..it kept me interested with the blog.
- J LO
Dani--I liked what you said about Oedipus making a comeback. He ends the play as the king who does what he must for the welfare of the people.
Also, great picture, although the sphinx doesn't look especially scary or carnivorous, does it?
Danni,
Excellent job! Your blog was very well-written and very captivating. I think it is kind of rude that Sophocles presents Oedipus as such a good king only to let the reader be disappointed by his curse and his immense pride in himself. At the same time, its kind of sad that such a terrible fate was forced upon his soul. I would hate to have that happen to me. Despite this, he tries fairly hard to be the best king he can in his given situation and he does a good job for the most part--until the curse kicks in. Keep up the good work.
Post a Comment